W-18895431 test: improve FieldModifierValidator test for virtual modifiers #85
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Replace empty test with meaningful validation for inner class fields - Add clarifying comments about virtual modifier scope (classes vs fields) - Document that virtual inner classes are handled by grammar/ClassModifierValidator - Ensure field validation rules apply consistently to inner class fields Related to virtual classes parsing fix in apex-parser grammar
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this PR adds a test for a virtual inner class that is being treated as a field (and therefore validation were producing false positives) using the current compiler @W-18895431@