Skip to content

modules: lvgl: Optional BGR888 to RGB888 #93599

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2025

Conversation

pdgendt
Copy link
Contributor

@pdgendt pdgendt commented Jul 23, 2025

Some display controllers allow to work with BGR888 directly, a significant reduction in CPU load is gained this way.

@zephyrbot zephyrbot added the area: LVGL Light and Versatile Graphics Library Support label Jul 23, 2025
@zephyrbot zephyrbot requested review from brgl, faxe1008 and uLipe July 23, 2025 14:34
Some display controllers allow to work with BGR888 directly, a significant
reduction in CPU load is gained this way.

Signed-off-by: Pieter De Gendt <[email protected]>
Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@faxe1008 faxe1008 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense but might break some out of tree users. Maybe add an migration guide entry as a heads up?

@pdgendt
Copy link
Contributor Author

pdgendt commented Jul 25, 2025

Makes sense but might break some out of tree users. Maybe add an migration guide entry as a heads up?

It's default enabled, so should be backwards compatible? Or is it because of the depends on LV_COLOR_DEPTH_24?

@faxe1008
Copy link
Contributor

Woops did not see the default, all good then 👍

@fabiobaltieri fabiobaltieri merged commit 65e21f0 into zephyrproject-rtos:main Jul 25, 2025
25 checks passed
@pdgendt pdgendt deleted the lvgl-24-invert branch July 25, 2025 17:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area: LVGL Light and Versatile Graphics Library Support
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants