Skip to content

chore: Add ADR for web framework #15

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 25, 2025

Conversation

vickystickz
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

  • Sets up Web framework Architectural Decision Records (ADR) for the UseOSM project to document key technical decisions and their context. This will help maintain clarity, support team alignment, and ensure traceability of important choices throughout the project's lifecycle.

#6

Copy link
Contributor

@jeafreezy jeafreezy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM. Maybe we can specify that we will use React with Astro.

@jeafreezy
Copy link
Contributor

I'm wondering if we should add ADR for Tailwind too. Will that be a separate PR or can we add it to this @vickystickz ?

@VickCodes
Copy link

I'm wondering if we should add ADR for Tailwind too. Will that be a separate PR or can we add it to this @vickystickz ?

No, I will add it here so we close up the issue at once

Copy link
Contributor

@jeafreezy jeafreezy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is great @VickCodes. Please change the framework status to 'Accepted' since we've all agreed to use it.

It will be great if you can add a short consequences section e.g Learning curve.

Thanks.

@jeafreezy jeafreezy merged commit 66cff7d into unpatterned-labs:main Jul 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants