Skip to content

OCPBUGS-58050: fix missing form styles in storage pages #15229

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 9, 2025

Conversation

rhamilto
Copy link
Member

@rhamilto rhamilto commented Jul 1, 2025

Follow on fix for #15205 that was not part of the original bug.

The change to RestorePVCModal is untested as I don't know how to configure that so it shows up. @yanpzhan, can you help?

After

Screenshot 2025-07-01 at 7 56 12 AM

Bonus fix to Add Storage page heading:
Note: PatternFly does not provide a mechanism to have different font sizes in headings, so all heading text is the same size now

Screenshot 2025-07-01 at 11 22 52 AM

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 1, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rhamilto: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58050, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Follow on fix for #15205 that was not part of the original bug.

After

Screenshot 2025-07-01 at 7 56 12 AM

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from kyoto and Mylanos July 1, 2025 11:59
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added component/core Related to console core functionality approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jul 1, 2025
@rhamilto
Copy link
Member Author

rhamilto commented Jul 1, 2025

/cherry-pick release-4.19
/assign @logonoff

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@rhamilto: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.19 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.19
/assign @logonoff

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Member

@logonoff logonoff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 1, 2025
@rhamilto
Copy link
Member Author

rhamilto commented Jul 1, 2025

/hold

I believe there is more to do here.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 1, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 1, 2025
@rhamilto rhamilto changed the title OCPBUGS-58050: fix missing form styles in Add Storage page OCPBUGS-58050: fix missing form styles in storage pages Jul 1, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the kind/i18n Indicates issue or PR relates to internationalization or has content that needs to be translated label Jul 1, 2025
@rhamilto
Copy link
Member Author

rhamilto commented Jul 1, 2025

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 1, 2025
@rhamilto
Copy link
Member Author

rhamilto commented Jul 1, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jul 1, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rhamilto: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58050, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.20.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yanpzhan

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jul 1, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from yanpzhan July 1, 2025 18:04
@rhamilto
Copy link
Member Author

rhamilto commented Jul 1, 2025

/retest

@yanpzhan
Copy link
Contributor

yanpzhan commented Jul 2, 2025

@rhamilto the RestorePVCModal is used on a VolumeSnapshot action list. You can create a VolumeSnapshot(first prepare a bound pvc), then open 'Restore as new PVC' in its action list.

@rhamilto
Copy link
Member Author

rhamilto commented Jul 2, 2025

@rhamilto the RestorePVCModal is used on a VolumeSnapshot action list. You can create a VolumeSnapshot(first prepare a bound pvc), then open 'Restore as new PVC' in its action list.

Thanks! Do you have steps to reproduce? I couldn't get the menu action to enable.

@yanpzhan
Copy link
Contributor

yanpzhan commented Jul 3, 2025

@rhamilto Do you have default StorageClass on your cluster?
You need create a PersistentVolumeClaim from 'Storage'->'Create PersistentVolumeClaims' page based on existing StorageClass, if the PersistentVolumeClaim is not bound, add it to a deployment(using Add Storage in deployment action list), then the PersistentVolumeClaim will be bound.
Go to 'Storage'->'VolumeSnapshots' to create VolumeSnapshot, choose a PersistentVolumeClaim in bound status for field 'PersistentVolumeClaim'. Then the 'Restore as new PVC' item will be enabled in the VolumeSnapshot action list.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0653c05 and 2 for PR HEAD a52acf8 in total

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 3, 2025
@logonoff
Copy link
Member

logonoff commented Jul 3, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 3, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0653c05 and 2 for PR HEAD 24833a9 in total

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0653c05 and 2 for PR HEAD 24833a9 in total

@rhamilto
Copy link
Member Author

rhamilto commented Jul 3, 2025

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD c3ea9fa and 1 for PR HEAD 24833a9 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 1a34135 and 0 for PR HEAD 24833a9 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

Revision 24833a9 was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 4, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 7, 2025
@rhamilto
Copy link
Member Author

rhamilto commented Jul 7, 2025

@logonoff, I pushed changes as I was seeing linting issues. Please retag.

@logonoff
Copy link
Member

logonoff commented Jul 7, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 7, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: logonoff, rhamilto

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@rhamilto
Copy link
Member Author

rhamilto commented Jul 8, 2025

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 22549b0 and 2 for PR HEAD 80a45a6 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 716d88c and 2 for PR HEAD 80a45a6 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD cbb54b0 and 1 for PR HEAD 80a45a6 in total

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 9, 2025

@rhamilto: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit cc582a8 into openshift:main Jul 9, 2025
7 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rhamilto: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58050: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58050 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Follow on fix for #15205 that was not part of the original bug.

The change to RestorePVCModal is untested as I don't know how to configure that so it shows up. @yanpzhan, can you help?

After

Screenshot 2025-07-01 at 7 56 12 AM

Bonus fix to Add Storage page heading:
Note: PatternFly does not provide a mechanism to have different font sizes in headings, so all heading text is the same size now

Screenshot 2025-07-01 at 11 22 52 AM

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@rhamilto: new pull request created: #15258

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.19
/assign @logonoff

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. component/core Related to console core functionality jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. kind/i18n Indicates issue or PR relates to internationalization or has content that needs to be translated lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants