Skip to content

discord-yargs.js.org #9920

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

idkmyusername72
Copy link

  • There is reasonable content on the page
  • I have read and accepted the Terms and Conditions
  • The site content can be seen at discord-yargs.github.io/website

The site content is Hablando del paquete de npm 'discord-yargs', que usa 'yargs'. Ayer, su creador y desarrollador principal fue expulsado de .js.org por su actitud grosera. Lo siento por eso.

@MattIPv4
Copy link
Member

MattIPv4 commented Jul 4, 2025

👋 Please could you explain your relation to #9919 + #9917 and the user involved in that?

@MattIPv4 MattIPv4 added the awaiting response This PR is waiting for a response from the requester label Jul 4, 2025
@idkmyusername72
Copy link
Author

Él colabora conmigo en ese proyecto, no hay más. 'discord-yargs' fue idea mía, pero él fue quien lo desarrolló.

@idkmyusername72
Copy link
Author

Disculpen su actitud, la verdad es que no tenemos trato personal, solo colaboramos en 'discord-yargs'.

@MattIPv4
Copy link
Member

MattIPv4 commented Jul 4, 2025

@indus I defer to you on whether we should accept this request or not (the content seems legit, but we blocked the previous user).

@idkmyusername72
Copy link
Author

No tendría problema incluso si rechazas esta solicitud.

@indus
Copy link
Member

indus commented Jul 4, 2025

Si no tienen ningún problema con eso, entonces el caso está claro...

@indus indus closed this Jul 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting response This PR is waiting for a response from the requester
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants