-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 473
Update dependencies and fix changes #757
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @hahwul, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request primarily focuses on updating the project's Go dependencies to their latest versions. It includes necessary code modifications to accommodate changes in the updated libraries' APIs, ensuring continued functionality. Additionally, some minor code formatting improvements are included.
Highlights
- Dependency Updates: Several Go dependencies have been updated to newer versions, including
mcp-go
,tablewriter
, andgolang.org/x/sync
, along with some indirect dependencies. - Code Adaptation for Library Changes: Code has been modified to align with API changes in updated libraries, specifically affecting how tables are created with
tablewriter
and how arguments are accessed in themcp-go
server handler. - Code Formatting: Minor formatting adjustments (mostly indentation) have been applied across several Go files.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request focuses on updating several dependencies, notably github.com/mark3labs/mcp-go
and github.com/olekukonko/tablewriter
, and includes necessary code modifications to adapt to their new APIs. The changes in internal/report/report.go
correctly implement the updated tablewriter
API. Many other changes are minor formatting adjustments.
The primary feedback concerns the handling of parameters from the updated mcp-go
library in pkg/server/mcp.go
. To enhance robustness and prevent potential panics, it's recommended to use the 'comma, ok' idiom for type assertions and map accesses. Overall, the dependency updates and associated fixes seem to be the core intent, and the adaptations are mostly on track.
@@ -96,7 +96,10 @@ | |||
|
|||
// Handler for the scan tool | |||
s.AddTool(scanTool, func(ctx context.Context, request mcp.CallToolRequest) (*mcp.CallToolResult, error) { | |||
url := request.Params.Arguments["url"].(string) | |||
// Type assert Arguments to map[string]any | |||
args := request.Params.Arguments.(map[string]any) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This direct type assertion for request.Params.Arguments
can panic if the actual type is not map[string]any
. It's safer to use the 'comma, ok' idiom to check the success of the assertion and handle potential errors gracefully.
args, ok := request.Params.Arguments.(map[string]any)
if !ok {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("arguments are not of expected type map[string]any")
}
// Type assert Arguments to map[string]any | ||
args := request.Params.Arguments.(map[string]any) | ||
|
||
url := args["url"].(string) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Accessing the map key "url"
and type asserting its value directly can lead to a panic if the key is not present or if its value is not a string. Using the 'comma, ok' idiom for both map access and type assertion would make this safer. This check can also be combined with the emptiness check for url
on the subsequent line.
urlVal, ok := args["url"].(string)
if !ok {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("url parameter is missing or not a string")
}
url := urlVal
@@ -218,7 +221,10 @@ | |||
|
|||
// Handler for the results tool | |||
s.AddTool(resultsTool, func(ctx context.Context, request mcp.CallToolRequest) (*mcp.CallToolResult, error) { | |||
scanID := request.Params.Arguments["scan_id"].(string) | |||
// Type assert Arguments to map[string]any | |||
args := request.Params.Arguments.(map[string]any) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Similar to the 'url' parameter handling, this direct type assertion for request.Params.Arguments
can panic. Employing the 'comma, ok' idiom is recommended for robust error handling.
args, ok := request.Params.Arguments.(map[string]any)
if !ok {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("arguments are not of expected type map[string]any")
}
// Type assert Arguments to map[string]any | ||
args := request.Params.Arguments.(map[string]any) | ||
|
||
scanID := args["scan_id"].(string) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Directly accessing and type asserting args["scan_id"]
can cause a panic if the key is absent or the value is not a string. It's advisable to use the 'comma, ok' idiom for safer map access and type assertion. This can be combined with the emptiness check for scanID
on the next line.
scanIDVal, ok := args["scan_id"].(string)
if !ok {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("scan_id parameter is missing or not a string")
}
scanID := scanIDVal
Fix #748 #751 #752