Skip to content

Update dependencies and fix changes #757

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 15, 2025
Merged

Conversation

hahwul
Copy link
Owner

@hahwul hahwul commented Jun 15, 2025

Fix #748 #751 #752

@hahwul hahwul self-assigned this Jun 15, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @hahwul, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on updating the project's Go dependencies to their latest versions. It includes necessary code modifications to accommodate changes in the updated libraries' APIs, ensuring continued functionality. Additionally, some minor code formatting improvements are included.

Highlights

  • Dependency Updates: Several Go dependencies have been updated to newer versions, including mcp-go, tablewriter, and golang.org/x/sync, along with some indirect dependencies.
  • Code Adaptation for Library Changes: Code has been modified to align with API changes in updated libraries, specifically affecting how tables are created with tablewriter and how arguments are accessed in the mcp-go server handler.
  • Code Formatting: Minor formatting adjustments (mostly indentation) have been applied across several Go files.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 15, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 37.50000% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
pkg/server/mcp.go 0.00% 15 Missing ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@hahwul hahwul merged commit 3edd7db into main Jun 15, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@hahwul hahwul deleted the refactor/lint-and-dependencies branch June 15, 2025 14:02
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request focuses on updating several dependencies, notably github.com/mark3labs/mcp-go and github.com/olekukonko/tablewriter, and includes necessary code modifications to adapt to their new APIs. The changes in internal/report/report.go correctly implement the updated tablewriter API. Many other changes are minor formatting adjustments.

The primary feedback concerns the handling of parameters from the updated mcp-go library in pkg/server/mcp.go. To enhance robustness and prevent potential panics, it's recommended to use the 'comma, ok' idiom for type assertions and map accesses. Overall, the dependency updates and associated fixes seem to be the core intent, and the adaptations are mostly on track.

@@ -96,7 +96,10 @@

// Handler for the scan tool
s.AddTool(scanTool, func(ctx context.Context, request mcp.CallToolRequest) (*mcp.CallToolResult, error) {
url := request.Params.Arguments["url"].(string)
// Type assert Arguments to map[string]any
args := request.Params.Arguments.(map[string]any)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

This direct type assertion for request.Params.Arguments can panic if the actual type is not map[string]any. It's safer to use the 'comma, ok' idiom to check the success of the assertion and handle potential errors gracefully.

args, ok := request.Params.Arguments.(map[string]any)
if !ok {
    return nil, fmt.Errorf("arguments are not of expected type map[string]any")
}

// Type assert Arguments to map[string]any
args := request.Params.Arguments.(map[string]any)

url := args["url"].(string)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Accessing the map key "url" and type asserting its value directly can lead to a panic if the key is not present or if its value is not a string. Using the 'comma, ok' idiom for both map access and type assertion would make this safer. This check can also be combined with the emptiness check for url on the subsequent line.

urlVal, ok := args["url"].(string)
if !ok {
    return nil, fmt.Errorf("url parameter is missing or not a string")
}
url := urlVal

@@ -218,7 +221,10 @@

// Handler for the results tool
s.AddTool(resultsTool, func(ctx context.Context, request mcp.CallToolRequest) (*mcp.CallToolResult, error) {
scanID := request.Params.Arguments["scan_id"].(string)
// Type assert Arguments to map[string]any
args := request.Params.Arguments.(map[string]any)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Similar to the 'url' parameter handling, this direct type assertion for request.Params.Arguments can panic. Employing the 'comma, ok' idiom is recommended for robust error handling.

args, ok := request.Params.Arguments.(map[string]any)
if !ok {
    return nil, fmt.Errorf("arguments are not of expected type map[string]any")
}

// Type assert Arguments to map[string]any
args := request.Params.Arguments.(map[string]any)

scanID := args["scan_id"].(string)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Directly accessing and type asserting args["scan_id"] can cause a panic if the key is absent or the value is not a string. It's advisable to use the 'comma, ok' idiom for safer map access and type assertion. This can be combined with the emptiness check for scanID on the next line.

scanIDVal, ok := args["scan_id"].(string)
if !ok {
    return nil, fmt.Errorf("scan_id parameter is missing or not a string")
}
scanID := scanIDVal

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant