fix: Unexpected input(s) 'predicate-quantifier'

[petermetz]

Declared the input parameter in the action.yml file so GitHub should
no longer complain about invalid input when we use the new feature.

Fixes #225

Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyvari [email protected]

[Joshua-Douglas]

Thanks for fixing! I came here to do the same after running into linting errors from rhysd/actionlint.

[prathamVaidya]

@dorny I don't like the redness of the linting errors. Please merge this PR.

[damageboy]

+1

Interested in seeing this deployed too... :)

[watanabeyu]

+1

eagerly awaiting...

[mathieu-chiavassa]

Amazing, thank you so much !! Will it be possible to deploy these changes any time soon ? 🙏

[tyler-adams-kr]

+1 would love to see this released @petermetz @dorny

[momentmaker]

same - let's merge this so we can get rid of the annotation :)

[cebarobot]

+1. When will this PR merged into master? 😣

[ahsankarimbhai]

+1 Please merge this PR

[jcadavez]

When will this PR be merged

[JosiahSiegel]

maybe it's time to fork this action to add this change

[sarangard]

+1 Please review and merge this PR 🙏

[robbie-anam]

+1 eagerly awaiting a merge!

[ParGG]

+1 🙏

[hspitzley-czi]

Would love for this to be merged. cc @dorny

[randallt21]

Can we please get this merged. cc @dorny

[galexeyev]

@dorny Can we please get this merged?

[NeerajLaljiTHG]

@dorny can we get this merged please :)

[trombini77]

Please is possible to merge this fix to stop the false warning in the execution with predicate-quantifier arg?

[dswaffordcw]

This PR appears to be abandoned. I just put up a replacement under #258

[yanetrodriguez25]

@dorny Can we merge this PR please? thanks!!

[sasa-fajkovic]

@dorny Can we add more approves if you don't have time?

[sasa-fajkovic]

@JJ @jsoref @billyvg Maybe you folks can press the button to resolve this small annoyance :)

[jsoref]

@sasa-fajkovic: this repository is not in an org, it's in @dorny's personal account, which generally means that only the owner can do releases.

Notes:

1. I don't use this action (or really any action in this category)
2. I'm not endorsing this action (or any other similar action)
3. There's no requirement that you use the original version of an action, GitHub doesn't give any particular preference to any repository in a fork network when running actions.
4. Fwiw, the PR itself seems fine.
5. If I wanted to use this action, I'd just use uses: petermetz/paths-filter@5ee2f5d4cf5d7bdd998a314a42da307e2ae1639d
6. Afaict, Michal is still alive (as of April 9) but has not publicly touched GitHub since de90cc6.