Skip to content

fix: make the docs link checking more useful/less faily #3630

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rtyler
Copy link
Member

@rtyler rtyler commented Jul 28, 2025

Signed-off-by: R. Tyler Croy [email protected]

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 75.44%. Comparing base (bb8728e) to head (2bdd0f4).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3630   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   75.43%   75.44%           
=======================================
  Files         146      146           
  Lines       44908    44908           
  Branches    44908    44908           
=======================================
+ Hits        33878    33880    +2     
+ Misses       9211     9209    -2     
  Partials     1819     1819           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@rtyler rtyler force-pushed the fix/stupid-link-checker branch 3 times, most recently from 4361252 to 676d520 Compare July 28, 2025 02:18
@rtyler rtyler force-pushed the fix/stupid-link-checker branch from 676d520 to 2d79b2f Compare July 28, 2025 02:19
@rtyler rtyler marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2025 02:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants