[SPARK-52505][K8S] Allow to create executor kubernetes service #51203
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This allows executors to register its block manager with the driver via a Kubernetes service name rather than the pod IP. This allows driver and executor to connect to the executor block manager via the service.
Why are the changes needed?
In Kubernetes, connecting to an evicted (decommissioned) executor times out after 2 minutes (default). Executors connect to other executors synchronously (one at a time), so this time out accumulates for each executor peer. An executor that reads from many decommissioned executors blocks for a multiple of the timeout until it fails with a fetch failure.
This can be fixed by binding the block manager to a fixed port, defining a Kubernetes service for that block manager port and have the executor register that K8S service port with the driver. The driver and other executors then connect to the service name and instantly fail with a connection refused if the executor got decommissioned and the service removed.
Setting
spark.kubernetes.executor.enableService=true
and definingspark.blockManager.port
will perform this setup for each executor.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.