Skip to content

[WIP] Proposal for dragonfly integration #479

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jiahuipaung
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it

Integrating Dragonfly for efficient model and Image distribution

Which issue(s) this PR fixes

Fixes #361

Special notes for your reviewer

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

@InftyAI-Agent InftyAI-Agent added needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a label and requires one. do-not-merge/needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a label and requires one. labels Jul 12, 2025
@InftyAI-Agent InftyAI-Agent requested review from carlory and cr7258 July 12, 2025 17:21
@jiahuipaung jiahuipaung changed the title Proposal for dragonfly integration [WIP] Proposal for dragonfly integration Jul 13, 2025
@pacoxu
Copy link
Contributor

pacoxu commented Jul 21, 2025

/kind feature

@InftyAI-Agent InftyAI-Agent added feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. and removed do-not-merge/needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a label and requires one. labels Jul 21, 2025
@pacoxu
Copy link
Contributor

pacoxu commented Jul 21, 2025

/kind documentation
for KEP

@InftyAI-Agent InftyAI-Agent added the documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. label Jul 21, 2025
@carlory
Copy link
Member

carlory commented Jul 21, 2025

Thanks for your proposal. Please ping us again once it is ready for review.

@jiahuipaung jiahuipaung force-pushed the feature/integrate-dragonfly branch from 5db7844 to 7db39d4 Compare July 25, 2025 03:28
@jiahuipaung
Copy link
Contributor Author

@carlory @pacoxu
This PR has been updated. Kindly help review, especially focusing on:

  • Integration logic for Dragonfly;
  • Compatibility with existing image/model loading workflows;
  • Any missing edge cases or deployment risks.

Appreciate your time and feedback. Thanks!

@carlory
Copy link
Member

carlory commented Jul 29, 2025

will have a look this week

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a label and requires one.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Enabling Efficient Model and Container Image Distribution in LLMaz with Dragonfly
4 participants