Skip to content

fix wording in Tracking filter rules stats #720

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 9, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/general/ad-filtering/tracking-filter-statistics.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ The *Send statistics for ad filters usage* option is disabled by default. Nothin

Let's start by defining what ad filters are. Thanks to these filters, AdGuard removes ads from websites. They are manually compiled based on your complaints about ads on websites. Ad filters are an essential element of AdGuard — their quality determines the overall quality of AdGuard ad blocking.

However, there is a downside. Over the years, more and more ad filters have been appearing. And the more ad filters are there, the more memory AdGuard consumes, thus slowing down the rendering of web pages. At the same time, some of the filters start to expire, gradually becoming a dead weight that has no use, only consumes memory, and slows down the program.
However, there is a downside. Over the years, more and more ad filters have appeared. The more ad filters there are, the more memory AdGuard consumes, thus slowing down the rendering of webpages. At the same time, some filters expire and gradually become useless, consuming memory and slowing down the program.

### Why do we need statistics?

Expand Down