Skip to content

False positive with sanitization in method #977

Open
@draftyfrog

Description

@draftyfrog

Pysa Bug

Pre-submission checklist
[x] I've checked the list of common issues and mine does not appear

I've reported a similar issue for Mariana Trench (Issue 179) so maybe that's just expected behavior.

Bug description
Please consider the following code

my_instance = MyClass()
my_instance.attribute = source()
sanitize(my_instance)
sink(my_instance.attribute) # Reported by Pysa

using the following functions/classes

def sink(param: str): # Defined as sink in Pysa config
    pass

def source(): # Defined as source in Pysa config
    return "Secret"

def sanitize(a: MyClass):
    a.attribute = ""

class MyClass:
    attribute: str

Running Pysa on this code returns one issue (as annotated in the code above), but actually no taint is leaked in this code.

If we move the sanitizing inline like this:

my_instance = MyClass()
my_instance.attribute = source()
my_instance.attribute = ""
sink(my_instance.attribute) # Not reported by Pysa

Pysa correctly doesn't report the issue.

I call pysa via pyre analyze --save-results-to ./results/ and I'm using version 0.9.23.

Activity

arthaud

arthaud commented on Mar 17, 2025

@arthaud
Contributor

Hi,

please see my answer for Mariana Trench, which also applies here facebook/mariana-trench#179

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

        Participants

        @arthaud@draftyfrog

        Issue actions

          False positive with sanitization in method · Issue #977 · facebook/pyre-check