Skip to content

Add Comparison Chart to Top 8 Alternatives #1709

Open
@vtempest

Description

@vtempest

https://dev.to/vtempest/pdf-gec

Image description

PDF Processing Tools Comparison Matrix

Tool-by-Tool Feature Comparison

Feature PDFMiner Docling Reducto OpenAI PDF Camelot Tabula PyMuPDF Unstructured
Text Extraction Accuracy High (85/100) Very High (95/100) Very High (95/100) High (85/100) Medium (60/100) Medium (60/100) Very High (95/100) High (80/100)
Table Extraction Quality Poor (30/100) Excellent (95/100) Excellent (95/100) Good (75/100) Excellent (95/100) Good (75/100) Good (70/100) Good (75/100)
Layout Analysis Basic Advanced Advanced Advanced Table-focused Table-focused Basic Advanced
Processing Speed Slow Medium Fast Fast Medium Medium Very Fast Slow
OCR Support No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes
Chart/Graph Support No Yes Yes Yes No No No Limited
Learning Curve Steep Moderate Easy Very Easy Moderate Easy Moderate Moderate
Programming Language Python Python API/SDK API Python Java/Python Python Python

Pricing Comparison

Tool Starting Price Enterprise Pricing Cost Model
PDFMiner Free N/A Open Source
Docling Free N/A Open Source (MIT)
Reducto $300/month $1,825+/month Usage-based API
OpenAI PDF $0.001/token Custom Pay-per-use API
Camelot Free N/A Open Source
Tabula Free N/A Open Source
PyMuPDF Free Commercial licensing Dual license (AGPL/Commercial)
Unstructured Free Enterprise plans Freemium/SaaS

Performance Benchmarks

Speed Comparison (Pages per minute)

  • PyMuPDF: ~50-60 pages/min
  • Reducto: ~30-40 pages/min
  • OpenAI PDF: ~25-35 pages/min
  • Docling: ~20-25 pages/min
  • Camelot: ~15-20 pages/min
  • Tabula: ~15-20 pages/min
  • PDFMiner: ~5-10 pages/min
  • Unstructured: ~5-8 pages/min

Accuracy Ratings (Based on research studies)

  • Text Extraction: Docling > PyMuPDF = Reducto > PDFMiner > OpenAI PDF > Unstructured > Camelot = Tabula
  • Table Extraction: Docling = Camelot = Reducto > OpenAI PDF = Tabula = Unstructured > PyMuPDF > PDFMiner

Use Case Recommendations

Best for Simple Text Extraction

  1. PyMuPDF - Fastest performance, good accuracy
  2. PDFMiner - Detailed layout information, customizable
  3. Unstructured - Multi-format support

Best for Table Extraction

  1. Camelot - Specialized table extraction with visual debugging
  2. Docling - Advanced table structure preservation
  3. Reducto - Enterprise-grade table processing

Best for Complex Document Processing

  1. Docling - Advanced layout analysis, free
  2. Reducto - Enterprise features, high accuracy
  3. OpenAI PDF - AI-powered analysis

Best for Enterprise Deployments

  1. Reducto - Full enterprise features, SLA
  2. Docling - Open source, enterprise-ready
  3. OpenAI PDF - Scalable API

Best for Budget-Conscious Projects

  1. Docling - Advanced features, completely free
  2. PyMuPDF - Fast processing, free for open source
  3. Camelot - Excellent table extraction, free

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions