Open
Description
Feature Request / Improvement
Flink Table Maintenance was added in #11144, but there's no doc on its usage yet. TestMaintenanceE2E is a good reference.
Query engine
Flink
Willingness to contribute
- I can contribute this improvement/feature independentlyI would be willing to contribute this improvement/feature with guidance from the Iceberg communityI cannot contribute this improvement/feature at this time
Activity
JeonDaehong commentedon Jun 13, 2025
Hi, I’d like to take this issue.
I’ll open a PR shortly to add the documentation.
Could you please assign this issue to me?
Thanks!
manuzhang commentedon Jun 14, 2025
@JeonDaehong Thanks, we generally avoid assigning issues. Look forward to your PR.
JeonDaehong commentedon Jun 14, 2025
Thanks for the clarification!
I understand.
I’ll proceed without the assignment.
I’ll make sure to open a PR very soon. Looking forward to contributing!
JeonDaehong commentedon Jun 15, 2025
@manuzhang
Hello !
I’m planning to create a new file named flink-maintenance.md and include the content from this document:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/16g3vR18mVBy8jbFaLjf2JwAANuYOmIwr15yDDxovdnA/edit?tab=t.0
I’ll also add usage instructions in the markdown file.
Could you please confirm if this approach is okay before I proceed?
Thanks! :D
pvary commentedon Jun 15, 2025
CC: @Guosmilesmile, as she is working on these features.
I would recommend a more user focused documentation. The linked doc contains many development related details which are not something the users are concerned about.
Also, I would recommend to document the configuration possibilities introduced by @Guosmilesmile, which is the main concern for the users
JeonDaehong commentedon Jun 15, 2025
Thank you for the feedback!
I'll check the core features and configuration options, and work on a user-focused documentation accordingly.
@Guosmilesmile, since you were tagged and seem to be working on these features — is there anything I should refer to or be aware of?
If you can share anything helpful, I’ll make sure to include it in the updated docs.
Thanks again!
Guosmilesmile commentedon Jun 16, 2025
I also suggest that the documentation should be more user-focused, as the architecture documentation is a bit too detailed on development aspects.
JeonDaehong commentedon Jun 16, 2025
Thank you so much for your thoughtful feedback!
Based on your suggestions, I’ll revise the documentation with a more user-centric approach. I plan to thoroughly test everything myself and include detailed explanations from the user’s perspective.
It might take a bit of time, but I’m committed to making steady progress and completing it properly.
So if it’s okay, I’d like to take full responsibility for this PR and continue working on it myself.
Thanks again, and I hope you have a great day! :D
pvary commentedon Jun 16, 2025
@JeonDaehong: Do so, and ping us if you need any help.