Check for existing group upon creation

[Samaritan1011001]

Check if a group with the same members already exist for the user. If present, do not create a new one.

[alankley]

Hmm. So if 9 of 10 are the same it's ok?
Maybe this check is not necessary?
Maybe user will eventually remove/delete members so they aren't identical. Should we second guess them?
As long as only 1 group at a time is used, probably no harm in duplicate groups? As long as name/id is not the same

[Samaritan1011001]

Yes, but I was thinking we keep it simple in the beginning so it's easy for us to get the base app running. I feel once we have the basic group location sharing set up, we can add editing the group and it's members. It will just let us concentrate on the more important aspect of live location sharing without having to make it available for varying members of the group. We have plenty on our hands already and extra features must be considered after we have the base setup. What do you think?

…

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:36 PM Alan Kleymeyer ***@***.***> wrote: Hmm. So if 9 of 10 are the same it's ok? Maybe this check is not necessary? Maybe user will eventually remove/delete members so they aren't identical. Should we second guess them? As long as only 1 group at a time is used, probably no harm in duplicate groups? As long as name/id is not the same — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#30 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACTP7Z2T6JJPKMTR7ZDDDATS7FSTXANCNFSM4XVEIEZQ> .

[Samaritan1011001]

But then again we would need to put work into checking if a group with the same members exists. So, I guess a duplicate group is less work. I'll put that card to backlog for now and take it up later.

…

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:41 PM Manoj Bn ***@***.***> wrote: Yes, but I was thinking we keep it simple in the beginning so it's easy for us to get the base app running. I feel once we have the basic group location sharing set up, we can add editing the group and it's members. It will just let us concentrate on the more important aspect of live location sharing without having to make it available for varying members of the group. We have plenty on our hands already and extra features must be considered after we have the base setup. What do you think? On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:36 PM Alan Kleymeyer ***@***.***> wrote: > Hmm. So if 9 of 10 are the same it's ok? > Maybe this check is not necessary? > Maybe user will eventually remove/delete members so they aren't > identical. Should we second guess them? > As long as only 1 group at a time is used, probably no harm in duplicate > groups? As long as name/id is not the same > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#30 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACTP7Z2T6JJPKMTR7ZDDDATS7FSTXANCNFSM4XVEIEZQ> > . >

[alankley]

Editing the group is not currently supported?
I would think this is very basic to support from the beginning.
Groups with duplicate members don't do any harm. Adding checks to check for identical members is adding code.
Adding the check, however, is a small issue. I don't think it's necessary but I don't feel strongly about it.

[Samaritan1011001]

Haha yeah, I realized. Let's go with duplicates. Do you want to move these conversations to slack?

…

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:44 PM Alan Kleymeyer ***@***.***> wrote: Editing the group is not currently supported? I would think this is very basic to support from the beginning. Duplicate groups don't do any harm. Adding checks to check for identical members is adding code. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#30 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACTP7ZYIOHRWJZ3QSSOSJ6TS7FTSVANCNFSM4XVEIEZQ> .

[Samaritan1011001]

Hey Alan, I added cards that I think we can start with. The cards under "To Do" are in order of priority that I think we need to use. If you have other thoughts, happy to discuss. The ones in "Backlog" are the ones I feel we can consider at a later date when we have the base app refactored and running. Let me know what you think. Also, consider moving our conversations to slack or other instant messaging platforms. It's just quicker and easier to communicate. Thanks.

…

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:46 PM Manoj Bn ***@***.***> wrote: Haha yeah, I realized. Let's go with duplicates. Do you want to move these conversations to slack? On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:44 PM Alan Kleymeyer ***@***.***> wrote: > Editing the group is not currently supported? > I would think this is very basic to support from the beginning. > Duplicate groups don't do any harm. Adding checks to check for identical > members is adding code. > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#30 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACTP7ZYIOHRWJZ3QSSOSJ6TS7FTSVANCNFSM4XVEIEZQ> > . >

[alankley]

I agree. I suggested the same on a previous email. I have 2 different company Slack accounts. I just created a new Slack account using alankley@gmail.com if you use Slack.

…

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 1:10 PM ManojNB ***@***.***> wrote: Hey Alan, I added cards that I think we can start with. The cards under "To Do" are in order of priority that I think we need to use. If you have other thoughts, happy to discuss. The ones in "Backlog" are the ones I feel we can consider at a later date when we have the base app refactored and running. Let me know what you think. Also, consider moving our conversations to slack or other instant messaging platforms. It's just quicker and easier to communicate. Thanks. On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:46 PM Manoj Bn ***@***.***> wrote: > Haha yeah, I realized. Let's go with duplicates. Do you want to move these > conversations to slack? > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:44 PM Alan Kleymeyer < ***@***.***> > wrote: > >> Editing the group is not currently supported? >> I would think this is very basic to support from the beginning. >> Duplicate groups don't do any harm. Adding checks to check for identical >> members is adding code. >> >> — >> You are receiving this because you authored the thread. >> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub >> < #30 (comment) >, >> or unsubscribe >> < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACTP7ZYIOHRWJZ3QSSOSJ6TS7FTSVANCNFSM4XVEIEZQ > >> . >> > — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#30 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJ44WSO67BBW77NYWBXTH3S7FWTNANCNFSM4XVEIEZQ> .

[alankley]

I tried chatting through Gmail and it took me to Hangouts which is going away. Do you use Slack? I couldn't find a Free version. I have 2 company accounts with Slack. I also use GroupMe Chat app

…

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 2:01 PM Alan ***@***.***> wrote: I agree. I suggested the same on a previous email. I have 2 different company Slack accounts. I just created a new Slack account using ***@***.*** if you use Slack. On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 1:10 PM ManojNB ***@***.***> wrote: > Hey Alan, > > I added cards that I think we can start with. The cards under "To Do" are > in order of priority that I think we need to use. If you have other > thoughts, happy to discuss. > The ones in "Backlog" are the ones I feel we can consider at a later date > when we have the base app refactored and running. Let me know what you > think. > Also, consider moving our conversations to slack or other instant > messaging > platforms. It's just quicker and easier to communicate. Thanks. > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:46 PM Manoj Bn ***@***.***> wrote: > > > Haha yeah, I realized. Let's go with duplicates. Do you want to move > these > > conversations to slack? > > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:44 PM Alan Kleymeyer < > ***@***.***> > > wrote: > > > >> Editing the group is not currently supported? > >> I would think this is very basic to support from the beginning. > >> Duplicate groups don't do any harm. Adding checks to check for > identical > >> members is adding code. > >> > >> — > >> You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > >> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > >> < > #30 (comment) > >, > >> or unsubscribe > >> < > https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACTP7ZYIOHRWJZ3QSSOSJ6TS7FTSVANCNFSM4XVEIEZQ > > > >> . > >> > > > > — > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#30 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJ44WSO67BBW77NYWBXTH3S7FWTNANCNFSM4XVEIEZQ> > . >

[Samaritan1011001]

Hi Alan, I just created a slack workspace for trovami and added you. There is a free Slack version. You should be able to log in to the workspace from the invite I sent you. On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 2:13 PM Alan Kleymeyer <notifications@github.com> wrote:

…

I tried chatting through Gmail and it took me to Hangouts which is going away. Do you use Slack? I couldn't find a Free version. I have 2 company accounts with Slack. I also use GroupMe Chat app On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 2:01 PM Alan ***@***.***> wrote: > I agree. I suggested the same on a previous email. > I have 2 different company Slack accounts. > I just created a new Slack account using ***@***.*** if you use > Slack. > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 1:10 PM ManojNB ***@***.***> wrote: > >> Hey Alan, >> >> I added cards that I think we can start with. The cards under "To Do" are >> in order of priority that I think we need to use. If you have other >> thoughts, happy to discuss. >> The ones in "Backlog" are the ones I feel we can consider at a later date >> when we have the base app refactored and running. Let me know what you >> think. >> Also, consider moving our conversations to slack or other instant >> messaging >> platforms. It's just quicker and easier to communicate. Thanks. >> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:46 PM Manoj Bn ***@***.***> wrote: >> >> > Haha yeah, I realized. Let's go with duplicates. Do you want to move >> these >> > conversations to slack? >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:44 PM Alan Kleymeyer < >> ***@***.***> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Editing the group is not currently supported? >> >> I would think this is very basic to support from the beginning. >> >> Duplicate groups don't do any harm. Adding checks to check for >> identical >> >> members is adding code. >> >> >> >> — >> >> You are receiving this because you authored the thread. >> >> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub >> >> < >> #30 (comment) >> >, >> >> or unsubscribe >> >> < >> https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACTP7ZYIOHRWJZ3QSSOSJ6TS7FTSVANCNFSM4XVEIEZQ >> > >> >> . >> >> >> > >> >> — >> You are receiving this because you commented. >> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub >> < #30 (comment) >, >> or unsubscribe >> < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJ44WSO67BBW77NYWBXTH3S7FWTNANCNFSM4XVEIEZQ > >> . >> > — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#30 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACTP7Z7ZIFEC5EPMBUVLXT3S7F57NANCNFSM4XVEIEZQ> .